State Division of Human Rights v. Richard L. Kidder, Inc.
In the Matter of State Division of Human Rights v. Richard L. Kidder, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Application denied without prejudice to the right of petitioner to renew upon proof of noneomplianee with the order of the Commissioner and other facts showing the necessity for the enforcement of said order. (Executive Law, § 297, subd. 7; § 298; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Kerpoe, Testa & O’Donnell, 34 A D 2d 1111; and see Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Union Carbide Corp., 34 A D 2d 636; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Employers-Commercial Union Ins. Group, 33 A D 2d 273.)
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.