TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Stewart

The People of the State of New York v. Edward L. Stewart

People v. Stewart, 37 A.D.2d 908 (1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 28, 1971
Citations
37 A.D.2d 908325 N.Y.S.2d 5331971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3137

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant Philip L. Stewart was convicted of three counts of assault in the second degree and one count of obstructing governmental administration, and his brother, defendant Edward L. Stewart, was convicted of one count of assault in the second degree and one count of obstructing governmental administration. These convictions followed charges arising out of an altercation between the defendants and certain members of the Monroe County Sheriff’s Department when the defendants were committed to the County Jail on unrelated charges. The charges were that the defendants feloniously and with intent to prevent peace officers from performing lawful duties caused physical injury to the officers. The defense pleaded justification alleging that the officers were not performing lawful duties and that defendants *909 had reasonable grounds to believe that the officers were not so engaged. We conclude that it was error to preclude the defendant Philip Stewart from testifying directly as to his intent (People v. Levan, 295 N. Y. 26, 33-34 ; People v. Singleton, 21 A D 2d 907). It was also error to refuse to permit the defendants and their mother to testify that the Justice of the Peace, who signed the defendants’ original commitment order, had instructed defendants that they would not have to be photographed or fingerprinted. While the obieetion to this offer and the trial -court’s reason for sustaining it do not appear in the record, it was clearly relevant on the issue of the defendants’ respective intent and was not hearsay as thus offered (Richardson, Evidence [9th ed.l, §§ 206, 209). Accordingly, we are required to reverse and grant defendants a new trial. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court convicting defendant of obstructing governmental administration and assault, second degree.) Present—-DelVecehio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Cardamone, JJ. «

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 11984: 11986: 11997: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Decker v. Campus981 F. Supp. 851 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
  2. Rothschild v. State of New York388 F. Supp. 1346 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)
  3. People v. Rivera101 A.D.2d 981 (1984)
  4. People v. O'Reilly125 A.D.2d 979 (1986)

Most recent

  1. Decker v. Campus981 F. Supp. 851 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
  2. People v. O'Reilly125 A.D.2d 979 (1986)
  3. People v. Rivera101 A.D.2d 981 (1984)
  4. Rothschild v. State of New York388 F. Supp. 1346 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Levan, 64 N.E.2d 341 (N.Y. 1945) 57

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list