TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wienerwald 8th Street, Inc. v. Third Brevoort Corp.

Wienerwald 8th Street, Inc., Appellant-Respondent v. Third Brevoort Corporation, and One East 8th St. Corp., Appellants-Respondents

Wienerwald 8th St., Inc. v. Third Brevoort Corp., 38 A.D.2d 524 (1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 9, 1971
Citations
38 A.D.2d 524326 N.Y.S.2d 8581971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2757

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 29, 1971, denying plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction and for tolling of the notices of default, and denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss, unanimously reversed, on the law, and judgment is granted plaintiff declaring the notice of default to have been complied with, and the landlords are permanently enjoined from canceling or terminating the leases for alleged failure to comply with said notices of default. Appellants Wienerwald 8th Street, Inc., and One East 8th St. Corp. shall recover of defendant-respondent-appellant one bill of $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. These similar notices of’ default, served under their respective leases, set forth Buildings Department violation Z7-71 as the grounds for the default. An order to show cause was issued on June 9, 1971 in this declaratory judgnient action, to restrain the respective landlords from terminating the leases and toll the running of the period set forth in the notices. Prior to the determination of this motion, the Board of Standards and Appeals granted the application of Wienerwald “ that the existing door * * * may remain installed * * • *525 on condition that this door shall be used for exit purposes only”. Wienerwald had retained architects to legalize the condition; prior to and until the time it was in fact legalized, there was no default under the leases. The record is clear that in any event the violation has been timely removed and the tenant has been protected by a stay and tolling (see First Nat. Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, 21 N Y 2d 630; 150 East 57th St. Assoc. v. Fletcher, 35 A D 2d 947). Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Murphy, Steuer and Eager, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list