TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Claim of Dixon

In the Matter of the Claim of Naomi Dixon, Louis L. Levine, as Industrial Commissioner

In re the Claim of Dixon, 41 A.D.2d 868 (1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 19, 1973
Citations
41 A.D.2d 868342 N.Y.S.2d 5421973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4690

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 15, 1971, disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits effective February 27, 1971, on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant’s notice of appeal from the October 15 decision of the board was dated January 3, 1972. On January 11, 1972 the Industrial Commissioner moved this court for an order dismissing claimant’s appeal as untimely (Labor Law, § 624). By decision dated April 11, 1972, we granted the Industrial Commissioner’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely and denied claimant’s cross motion for an extension of time. On May 31, 1972 claimant’s application to the board for a rescission of its prior decision was denied. Claimant now appeals from the board’s order denying her application to reopen and reconsider the board’s prior decision. An application to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to reopen and reconsider a prior decision is addressed to the discretion of the board. We find nothing in the record or in claimant’s brief to support her contention that the board abused its discretion in refusing to reopen its prior decision. In any event, we have examined the merits and find no support for claimant’s contentions. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Cooke, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 21978: 11980: 21989: 11991: 119752026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Mauskoff79 A.D.2d 790 (1980)
  2. In re Capital Hill Reporting, Inc.64 A.D.2d 778 (1978)
  3. In re the Claim of Michelfelder79 A.D.2d 791 (1980)
  4. In re the Claim of Allen154 A.D.2d 732 (1989)
  5. In re the Claim of Cruz49 A.D.2d 978 (1975)
  6. In re the Claim of Sinacori50 A.D.2d 657 (1975)

Most recent

  1. In re the Claim of Shapiro174 A.D.2d 921 (1991)
  2. In re the Claim of Allen154 A.D.2d 732 (1989)
  3. In re Mauskoff79 A.D.2d 790 (1980)
  4. In re the Claim of Michelfelder79 A.D.2d 791 (1980)
  5. In re Capital Hill Reporting, Inc.64 A.D.2d 778 (1978)
  6. In re the Claim of Sinacori50 A.D.2d 657 (1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list