TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Halmar Distributors, Inc. v. Approved ManufacturIng Corp.

Halmar Distributors, Inc. v. Approved ManufacturIng Corp., 49 A.D.2d 841 (1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 16, 1975
Citations
49 A.D.2d 841373 N.Y.S.2d 5991975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10983

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 13, 1975, denying defendants’ application for reconsideration (erroneously denominated as one for reargument) upon additional facts, of the “order” granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted and the preliminary iiyunction vacated, and appellants shall recover of respondent $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 24, 1975, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary iiyunction unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs and without disbursements. Subsequent to the decision of Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion for preliminary relief, an amended verified complaint was served which no longer contained a demand for a permanent iiyunction. An amended complaint having been served, it superseded the original complaint and became the only complaint in the case. (Branower & Son v Waldes, 173 App Div 676 .) Accordingly, the action herein must proceed as though the original pleading had never been served. (Millard v Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R.R. Co., 204 App Div 80 .) CPLR 6301 permits preliminary injunctive relief where there is a demand for permanent injunctive relief or where it appears that the defendant “threatens or is about to do * * * an act in violation of the plaintiff’s rights respecting the subject of the action”. Since, as afore-mentioned, a permanent injunction is no longer sought, the plaintiff must at this juncture satisfy that part of CPLR 6301 which permits issuance of a temporary injunction where plaintiff’s rights with respect to “the subject of the action” are threatened. *842 Plaintiff, however, has not satisfied that requirement since he merely seeks to recover monies which have been advanced to defendants and monies may not be considered the "subject” of the action within the meaning of CPLR 6301. (See, e.g., Eastern Rock Products v Natanson, 239 App Div 529 ; 7A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 6301.10.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Tilzer, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 25 cases

View all citing references →
1978: 21980: 21983: 21984: 11985: 11986: 11987: 11991: 11996: 11997: 11998: 12000: 22009: 22010: 12012: 12014: 12016: 12019: 12024: 12025: 119782026peak 1978 · 2

Most recent

  1. Zaiger LLC v. Bucher Law PLLC2025 NY Slip Op 03268 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025)
  2. S3 Partners, LLC v. Fidessa Corp.2024 NY Slip Op 31199(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024)
  3. Delaremore v. Zimmer Inc.No. 1:17-cv-00918 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 22, 2019)
  4. Board of Managers of the 125 North 10th Condominium v. 125North10, LLC51 Misc. 3d 585 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2016)
  5. Cassissi v. Yee46 Misc. 3d 552 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2014)
  6. Plaza PH2001 LLC v. Plaza Residential Owner LP98 A.D.3d 89 (2012)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Millard v. Del., Lackawanna & Western R.R., 204 A.D. 80 (1923) 23
Branower & Son, Inc. v. Waldes, 173 A.D. 676 (1916) 8
Eastern Rock Prods., Inc. v. Natanson, 239 A.D. 529 (1933) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list