People v. Boettner
The People of the State of New York v. Edward Boettner
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We affirm on the opinion at Special Term. We find no authority to support the dicta in People v Haskins ( 48 AD2d 480 ) that would depart from the established rule that neither the Fourth nor Fourteenth Amendments proscribe private as opposed to governmental activity in the area of searches made and statements taken in the course of criminal investigative procedures (see People v Gleeson, 36 NY2d 462 ; People v Horman, 22 NY2d 378 ). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of controlled substance, sixth degree.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Simons, Mahoney, Goldman and Del Vecchio, JJ. [ 80 Misc 2d 3 .]
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.