TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bowman v. Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District No. 15

In the Matter of Percy C. Bowman v. Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District No. 15

Bowman v. Bd. of Educ. of the Lawrence Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 15, 51 A.D.2d 544 (1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 19, 1976
Citations
51 A.D.2d 544378 N.Y.S.2d 4221976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10791

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 by petitioner, a tenured teacher employed by respondent, inter alia, to review respondent’s determination, dated July 16, 1974 and made after a hearing, which found him guilty of the charges of "conduct unbecoming a teacher”, "neglect of duty” and "inefficiency”, and dismissed him from his position. Determination modified, on the law, by reducing the penalty to a fine of $4,000. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. The findings of respondent are supported by substantial evidence. However, we hold that the punishment of dismissal was so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circum *545 stances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 222 , 233). The punishment imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein and constituted an abuse of discretion. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Haynes v. Board of Education57 A.D.2d 959 (1977)

Most recent

  1. Haynes v. Board of Education57 A.D.2d 959 (1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list