Feinberg v. Board of Education
In the Matter of Norman Feinberg v. Board of Education of the City of New York
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to pay petitioner moneys earned by him for certain per diem service, which moneys had been withheld to recoup an overpayment to petitioner, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 20, 1973, which directed appellants to pay petitioner $1,092.70. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion there is no authority to support appellants’ method of recoupment. Our determination is without prejudice to the institution of a plenary suit by appellants, if they be so advised. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.