TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Claim of Mastro

In the Matter of the Claim of Bette E. Mastro, Louis L. Levine, as Industrial Commissioner

In re the Claim of Mastro, 52 A.D.2d 708 (1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 29, 1976
Citations
52 A.D.2d 708382 N.Y.S.2d 5891976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12389

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant was advised by her employer on July 10, 1975 that she was being terminated on July 28, 1975. The claimant left her work and did not work the remaining days. Leaving work in anticipation of the discharge date is not good cause for leaving the employment (Matter of Berkowitz [Levine], 41 AD2d 791 ; Matter of Schneider [Levine], 37 AD2d 788 ). The record discloses no other justification for the leaving and, accordingly, the decision is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11979: 11989: 21992: 11993: 319782026peak 1993 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. South Dakota Stockgrowers Ass'n v. Holloway438 N.W.2d 561 (S.D. 1989)
  2. Fiskewold v. HM Smyth Co., Inc.440 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989)
  3. In re Vinson255 S.E.2d 644 (N.C. Ct. App. 1979)
  4. In re the Claim of Bradley190 A.D.2d 949 (1993)
  5. In re the Claim of Krokos184 A.D.2d 871 (1992)
  6. In re the Claim of Barney196 A.D.2d 924 (1993)

Most recent

  1. In re the Claim of Drechsler197 A.D.2d 739 (1993)
  2. In re the Claim of Barney196 A.D.2d 924 (1993)
  3. In re the Claim of Bradley190 A.D.2d 949 (1993)
  4. In re the Claim of Krokos184 A.D.2d 871 (1992)
  5. Fiskewold v. HM Smyth Co., Inc.440 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989)
  6. South Dakota Stockgrowers Ass'n v. Holloway438 N.W.2d 561 (S.D. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
In re the Claim of Berkowitz, 41 A.D.2d 791 (1973) 11
In re the Claim of Schneider, 37 A.D.2d 788 (1971) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list