Weissglass v. Weissglass
Oscar Weissglass v. Rose E. Weissglass
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered February 10, 1976, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant has failed to show a genuine necessity for more temporary alimony than was granted by Special Term. The parties are directed to proceed to an immediate trial. The remedy for any seeming inequity in a temporary order of alimony is a speedy trial, at which the rights of the parties may be fully determined (Thomases v Thomases, 51 AD2d 753 ). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.