TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bomze v. Bomze

Ina-Sue Bomze v. Edward L. Bomze

Bomze v. Bomze, 54 A.D.2d 631 (1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 12, 1976
Citations
54 A.D.2d 631387 N.Y.S.2d 4381976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14124

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Or *632 der, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 18, 1976, holding the defendant husband in contempt, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondent. Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 20, 1976, which order denied reargument, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable (Sklan v Sklan, 29 AD2d 526 ), without costs and without disbursements. The wife commenced an action for separation or, in the alternative, for a divorce. Special Term (by order of Starke, J., entered Nov. 6, 1975) granted relief to the wife pendente lite which, inter alia, provided for payments to the wife of $550 per week, effective July 8, 1975. The arrears due from July 8, 1975 through November 5, 1975 were to be paid within 15 days of service of a copy of that order with notice of entry. The order further allowed as a credit towards arrears any payments "made by the defendant directly to the plaintiff during said period” (July 8, 1975 through Nov. 5, 1975). The husband failed to pay the arrears as directed, resulting in the present order of contempt. The husband is concededly financially able to make the necessary payments and his failure to do so must be construed as willful. We note parenthetically that the credit allowed by Special Term for payments already made was in accord with the original pendente lite order. Concur&emdash;Murphy, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1992: 119922026peak 1992 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bell v. Bell181 A.D.2d 978 (1992)

Most recent

  1. Bell v. Bell181 A.D.2d 978 (1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list