Crossman Cadillac, Inc. v. Board of Assessors
In the Matter of Crossman Cadillac, Inc. v. Board of Assessors
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 27, 1976, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The narrow and only issue in this proceeding is whether petitioner has incorporated, as a part of its real estate, the communications system mentioned and described in its petition (see Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, Dept, of Assessment, 47 AD2d 29 , affd 38 NY2d 883 ). The trial of this proceeding should be limited to that issue (see CPLR 3212, subd [g]). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.