Zucker v. Siegel
Harry Zucker v. Herman Siegel, , (Action No. 1.) (And a Second Action.)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In an action inter alia to recover damages for breach of warranty, plaintiff Harry Zucker appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 11, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, is in favor of defendant Siegel and against him. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The trial court’s determination that appellant did not rely upon the warranty was amply supported by the evidence. Appellant’s claim was properly rejected (cf. Friedman v Medtronic, Inc., 42 AD2d 185 ). Margett, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.