TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Russo

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Marie Russo

Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Russo, 55 A.D.2d 597 (1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 6, 1976
Citations
55 A.D.2d 597389 N.Y.S.2d 1241976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15298

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals *598 from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 1976, which, inter alia, denied the application. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a hearing in accordance herewith. Under the terms of the policy in question, contact with the hit-and-run vehicle is a condition precedent to arbitration. Under the conflicting proof presented, the issue of whether there was contact should be decided at a hearing, at which all of the relevant facts may be presented. Latham, Acting P. J., Damiani, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list