Miceli v. Reilly
Giacoma Miceli v. Arthur Reilly
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In an action, inter alia, to recover possession of real property, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 8, 1976, as denied her motion for partial summary judgment. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. A trial is required to resolve issues of fact as to which lands are encompassed by the various deeds and as to the several affirmative defenses interposed. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.