TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Catala

In the Matter of Adarberto Catala, Also Known as Adalberto Catala, Alleged to be a Permanently Neglected Child. Petra Catala

In re Catala, 57 A.D.2d 823 (1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 31, 1977
Citations
57 A.D.2d 823395 N.Y.S.2d 4531977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12019

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered on or about May 5, 1976, after dispositional hearing, adjudging the subject child of respondent-appellant mother to be permanently neglected, terminating her rights, awarding custody to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner-respondent New York Foundling Hospital, with power to the latter to consent to the child’s adoption without notice to the mother, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The disposition made (Family Ct Act, §§ 631, 634) is amply justified by the evidence. Nor did the court abuse discretion in declining to hear evidence in favor of so-called open adoption in which the biological parent, though deprived of legal rights, would still maintain contact with the child. Such a relationship could not but confuse the child and result in harm rather than good. The *824 child’s interests are, of course, paramount. Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 219792026peak 1979 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People ex rel. Simmons v. Sheridan98 Misc. 2d 328 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1979)
  2. In re Erik Vaughn D. New York Foundling Hospital70 A.D.2d 800 (1979) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. In re Erik Vaughn D. New York Foundling Hospital70 A.D.2d 800 (1979) · Dissent
  2. People ex rel. Simmons v. Sheridan98 Misc. 2d 328 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list