TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Dubay v. La Vallee

The People of the State of New York ex rel. Almond R. Dubay v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility

People ex rel. Dubay v. La Vallee, 57 A.D.2d 1009 (1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 19, 1977
Citations
57 A.D.2d 1009394 N.Y.S.2d 3341977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12301

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered January 29, 1976 in Clinton County, which denied a writ of habeas corpus, without a hearing. This habeas corpus proceeding was initiated by petition dated August 12, 1975. A supplemental petition dated October 15, 1975 was thereafter served. Special Term denied the application without a hearing. This appeal ensued. Defendant pleaded guilty to robbery third degree in Warren County on June 7, 1954. Thereafter on February 15, 1965 he pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary, third degree, and grand larceny, first degree, in Washington County, He also pleaded guilty to an information charging a previous felony conviction. He maintains on this appeal that the 1965 sentence under the second offender statute was illegal because his 1954 conviction was void on both statutory and constitutional grounds. Specifically, he contends that he was not represented by counsel at the time of his 1954 plea and sentence. Concededly, the transcript is to the contrary. A copy of the record on file in the Warren County clerk’s office for the day in question clearly establishes that the defendant and his attorney were present at the time of plea and sentence and that the two-day waiting period before sentencing was waived. On this record we are of the view that Special Term properly dismissed the habeas corpus proceeding without a hearing. We have examined the other issues raised by petitioner and find them unpersuasive. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Main, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list