TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Dlugash

The People of the State of New York v. Melvin E. Dlugash

People v. Dlugash, 59 A.D.2d 745 (1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 17, 1977
Citations
59 A.D.2d 745398 N.Y.S.2d 5601977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13755

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 23, 1975, convicting him of murder, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By order dated March 1, 1976, this court reversed the judgment, on the law, and dismissed the indictment. On May 12, 1977 the Court of Appeals modified the order of this court and remitted the case to this court for its review of the facts pursuant to CPL 470.15 (see CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]) and for further proceedings with respect to the sentence (see CPL 470.20, subd 4) should the facts be found favorably to the People (People v Dlugash, 41 NY2d 725 , revg 51 AD2d 974 ). Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the conviction to one for attempted murder. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remanded to the Criminal Term for resentencing (see CPL 470.20, subd 4). A review of the record indicates that while the trial evidence adduced was not sufficient to support defendant’s guilt of the crime of murder, under the law as laid down by the Court of Appeals, it is sufficient beyond a reasonable doubt to establish his guilt of attempted murder. The contention that our modification of the verdict would be tantamount to depriving defendant of a jury trial may not now be given acceptance by this court since the same contention was urged by the defendant in his brief to the Court of Appeals and was clearly rejected by that court under the terms of its remand to this court. Martuscello, J. P., Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 21995: 119792026peak 1979 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commonwealth v. Lopez654 A.2d 1150 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995)
  2. Dlugash v. People of State of NY476 F. Supp. 921 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)
  3. People v. Dlugash70 A.D.2d 623 (1979)

Most recent

  1. Commonwealth v. Lopez654 A.2d 1150 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995)
  2. Dlugash v. People of State of NY476 F. Supp. 921 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)
  3. People v. Dlugash70 A.D.2d 623 (1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Dlugash, 51 A.D.2d 974 (1976) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list