TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Ramos

The People of the State of New York v. Israel Ramos

People v. Ramos, 59 A.D.2d 859 (1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 10, 1977
Citations
59 A.D.2d 859399 N.Y.S.2d 1231977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14016

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered January 16, 1976, convicting defendant of the crimes of murder in the second degree and possession of a weapon as a felony and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 20 years to life and a maximum of seven years, respectively, unanimously reversed, on the law, and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the sentences vacated, and a new trial directed on the counts charging those crimes. The failure of the trial court to inform counsel, prior to summation, that it intended to consider the crime of manslaughter in the first degree (which it did consider), was reversible error. (People v Moody, 52 AD2d 959 ; CPL 300.10, subd 3; 300.30, subd 1; 320.20, subd 5; see People v Skinner, 57 AD2d 785 .) In addition, the trial court’s failure to consider self-defense was error (Penal Law, § 35.15). There was evidence that, immediately prior to the fatal shooting, deceased stood in the only doorway to the office with knife in hand, insulted and threatened defendant. Because there was no finding that defendant possessed a weapon prior or subsequent to the shooting, we leave to the trial court the disputed issue as to whether defendant was in possession of a weapon at a time other than the shooting, in which event the possession charge would not be a lesser included charge (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]) and thus not subject to dismissal (see People v Ridout, 46 AD2d 643 ; People v Colon, 46 AD2d 624 ). In view of this disposition, there is no need to discuss the other points raised by defendant. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 31985: 11986: 11995: 12003: 119792026peak 1979 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jackson v. Edwards296 F. Supp. 2d 292 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)
  2. People v. Ramos68 A.D.2d 748 (1979)
  3. People v. Richards67 A.D.2d 893 (1979)
  4. People v. Hughes220 A.D.2d 529 (1995)
  5. People v. Lewis68 A.D.2d 862 (1979)
  6. People v. Brown121 A.D.2d 326 (1986)

Most recent

  1. Jackson v. Edwards296 F. Supp. 2d 292 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)
  2. People v. Hughes220 A.D.2d 529 (1995)
  3. People v. Brown121 A.D.2d 326 (1986)
  4. People v. Oglesby128 Misc. 2d 818 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1985)
  5. People v. Ramos68 A.D.2d 748 (1979)
  6. People v. Lewis68 A.D.2d 862 (1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Skinner, 57 A.D.2d 785 (1977) 14
People v. Colon, 46 A.D.2d 624 (1974) 11
People v. Moody, 52 A.D.2d 959 (1976) 9
People v. Ridout, 46 A.D.2d 643 (1974) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list