United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Consolidated proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review two orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 22, 1977 and July 6, *1011 1977, respectively, which, inter alia, affirmed separate orders of the State Commissioner of Human Rights declaring that petitioner’s policy of mandatory, unpaid pregnancy leave constituted unlawful sex discrimination in violation of section 296 of the Executive Law. Orders confirmed and petitions dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (see Executive Law, § 298). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.