TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Eagle Insurance v. Edgar Sabbeth Plywood & Flooring Corp.

Eagle Insurance Company v. Edgar Sabbeth Plywood & Flooring Corp., (And a Third-Party Action.)

Eagle Ins. v. Edgar Sabbeth Plywood & Flooring Corp., 73 A.D.2d 607 (1979)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 10, 1979
Citations
73 A.D.2d 607422 N.Y.S.2d 4431979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14406

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In an action by an insurance company for restitution of a claim paid to an insured, the defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated November 16, 1978, which, inter alia, (1) reversed an order of the First District Court, Mineóla, Nassau County, entered May 23, 1978, denying summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and (2) granted the motion for summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Defendant, Edgar Sabbeth Plywood & Flooring Corp., a supplier of specialized wood and lumber, filed a claim with plaintiff, its insurer, with respect to what was believed to be a lost shipment of oak flooring intended for the third-party defendant, Hall Flooring Corp. Plaintiff, upon investigation, paid the full claim less a $250 deductible. It is now conceded by all parties, however, that subsequent to plaintiffs payment of the claim, the shipment of oak flooring believed lost (and which “loss” *608 plaintiff had reimbursed against), was ascertained to have been actually delivered to the third-party defendant, albeit very late. Under these circumstances, we agree with the Appellate Term that summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff for restitution of the insurance proceeds paid was proper (see 18 Couch, Insurance [2d ed], § 74.189, pp 363-364; cf. Schleider v Maryland Cas. Co., 226 App Div 50, 52 , affd without opn 252 NY 598 ). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 119812026peak 1981 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Angus (In re Angus)9 B.R. 769 (Bankr. D. Or. 1981)

Most recent

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Angus (In re Angus)9 B.R. 769 (Bankr. D. Or. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Schleider v. Md. Cas. Co., Horowitz, 170 N.E. 158 (N.Y. 1930) 5
Schleider v. Md. Cas. Co., 226 A.D. 50 (1929) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list