Flushing Savings Bank v. CCN Realty Corp.
Flushing Savings Bank v. CCN Realty Corp., , and Richard Sanchez, Intervenor-Respondent
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, plaintiff mortgagee appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 10, 1979, as denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and required the addition of certain parties defendant. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision requiring plaintiff to join the New York State Department of Social Services as a defendant in this action and adding thereto a provision denying that part of defendant Wagner’s cross motion that requested such relief. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and within 20 days after service upon the plaintiff of a copy of the order to be entered hereon with notice of entry thereof, plaintiff shall serve upon the parties named in the caption as "JOHN DOE #1” through "JOHN DOE #200”, inclusive, all papers in this action, as necessary parties defendant. It was improper to require plaintiff to join the New York State Department of Social Services in this action since the department has no property interest in the premises so as to make it a necessary defendant in the foreclosure action (see Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, §§ 1311, 1313, 202). However, Special Term properly denied plaintiffs motion to amend the caption of the action to eliminate, as parties, the facility’s residents, who have not yet been served in the action. As tenants whose leaseholds are subordinate to the mortgage of plaintiff, they are necessary parties and must be joined by plaintiff (see Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 1311, subd 1; Averill v Taylor, 8 NY 44 ; National Bank of North Amer. v Gloucester Equities, 82 Mise 2d 811; *946 contra, Home Life Ins. Co. v O’Sullivan, 151 App Div 535 ; Robinson v Hartley, 134 Mise 703; Genuth v First Div. Ave. Realty Corp., 88 Mise 2d 586; Douglas v Kohart, 196 App Div 84 ; see, also, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v Childs Co., 230 NY 285 ). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“[T]he joinder of all tenants and other junior lienholders in a foreclosure action 1s required ... to extinguish the rights of redemption of all those who may have a subordinate interest in the property.”)
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- Federal District Courts1
- Bankruptcy Courts2
- State Appellate Courts7
- State Trial Courts2
- State Specialty Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Comcoach Corporation, Debtor- the Roslyn Savings Bank v. Comcoach Corporation
- In re Village Rathskeller, Inc.
- Roslyn Savings Bank v. Comcoach Corp. (In re Comcoach Corp.)
- Flushing Savings Bank v. Ahearn
- Polish National Alliance of Brooklyn, U.S.A. v. White Eagle Hall Co.
- 6820 Ridge Realty, L. L. C. v. Goldman
Most recent
- Blue Castle (Cayman) Ltd. v. David Jones; Jacqueline Callahan; Principis Capital, LLC; Toprock Funding, LLC; Incorporated Village of Lynbrook; Robert Baxmeyer; Jonathan Jones
- Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Bronx 1202 Spofford Ave. L.P.
- NYCTL 2012-A Trust v. Phillip
- Rockaway Improvement, LLC v. Danco Transmission Corp.
- 6820 Ridge Realty, L. L. C. v. Goldman
- East New York Savings Bank v. Austin Mall Associates
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.