TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McDivitt v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Bette McDivitt, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Gary L. McDivitt v. S.S. Kresge Company, and Denniston Chemical Company, and Third-Party Southern Can Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

McDivitt v. S. S. Kresge Co., 80 A.D.2d 740 (1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 26, 1981
Judges
Cardamone, Simons
Citations
80 A.D.2d 740437 N.Y.S.2d 4621981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10469

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant and third-party plaintiff Denniston Chemical Company has failed to show through anyone with personal knowledge that the witness to be deposed, Julian M. Campbell, is no longer within its control. All concur, except Cardamone, J.P., and Simons, J., who dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion, in the following memorandum.

Dissent — Cardamonesimons

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Cardamone, J.P., and Simons, J. (dissenting).

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries- sustained as the result of an explosion of an aerosol can of spray paint. She has sued defendant Denniston Chemical Company, an Illinois corporation, along with several others. Denniston, who allegedly packaged the can, instituted a third-party complaint against Southern Can Company, who made cans for the paint manufacturer and Southern moved for an examination before trial of Denniston and deposed its president, William Denniston. He was unable to identify the can in issue as one packaged by Denniston. Southern then sought to examine Julian M. Campbell, a former employee and plant manager for Denniston Chemical Company at its Wheeling, Illinois, plant. Denniston moved for an order vacating the notice to depose Campbell, alleging in affidavits by its president and attorney evidence sufficient for the purpose (see CPLR 3020, subd [d], par 3; 3021), that it was no longer engaged in business, had sold its assets and good will and that Campbell was no longer in its employ. It alleged further that the business was presently being conducted by a separate and unrelated company known as U. S. Packaging Company, and that it had no control over U.S. Packaging Company or any of its present or former employees. Special Term denied Denniston’s application. The order should be reversed. The court was without power to order examination of the corporation through a former employee (McGowan v Eastman, 271 NY 195, 198 ; Frankel v French & Polyclinic Med. School & Health Center, 70 AD2d 947, 948 ; Western Elevating Assn, v Chapman, 238 App Div 14 ; and see 7 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac, § 42:74). (Appeal from order of Niagara Supreme Court — discovery.) Present — Cardamone, J.P., Simons, Callahan, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
McGowan v. Eastman, 2 N.E.2d 625 (N.Y. 1936) 33
Western Elevating Ass'n v. Chapman, 238 A.D. 14 (1933) 7
Frankel v. French & Polyclinic Med. Sch. & Health Ctr., 70 A.D.2d 947 (1979) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list