TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Davis v. Davis

Erica J. Davis v. William J. Davis

Davis v. Davis, 83 A.D.2d 547 (1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 6, 1981
Citations
83 A.D.2d 547441 N.Y.S.2d 261981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14833

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), entered March 12, 1980, as (1) dismissed his counterclaim for divorce, (2) granted plaintiff a divorcé on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, (3) awarded plaintiff alimony of $190 per week and child support of $70 per week, and (4) awarded plaintiff a counsel fee of $3,500. Judgment affirmed, insofar as *548 appealed from, without costs or disbursements. A trial court possesses wide discretion to determine the issue of cruel and inhuman treatment and such determinations will not be lightly overturned on appeal (McKay v McKay, 78 AD2d 676 ; Arnold v Arnold, 52 AD2d 546 ). The trial court’s determination herein that the defendant had engaged in cruel and inhuman treatment of the plaintiff is supported by the record. In any event, it appears that based upon the findings of the trial court plaintiff would also be entitled to a divorce based on constructive abandonment as pleaded in her complaint (see Diemer v Diemer, 8 NY2d 206 ; Benarroch v Benarroch, 55 AD2d 943; Dudzick v Dudzick, 84 Misc 2d 731 ). Although defendant contends that he was entitled to a divorce based on the latter ground because it was the plaintiff who refused to enter into sexual relations with him, we defer to the trial court’s resolution of the conflicting testimony in this regard (see Mante v Mante, 34 AD2d 134, 138 ). The awards of alimony, child support and counsel fees were not improper in light of the parties’ needs, financial positions and employment capabilities, the marital standard of living and the duration of the marriage. Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1983: 61984: 11985: 11986: 11987: 11991: 12007: 119832026peak 1983 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Muscarella v. Muscarella93 A.D.2d 993 (1983)
  2. D'Amato v. D'Amato96 A.D.2d 849 (1983)
  3. Forcucci v. Forcucci96 A.D.2d 751 (1983)
  4. Clarkson v. Clarkson103 A.D.2d 964 (1984)
  5. Rispoli v. Rispoli131 A.D.2d 556 (1987)
  6. Carr v. Carr171 A.D.2d 776 (1991)

Most recent

  1. Curatola v. Curatola43 A.D.3d 974 (2007)
  2. Carr v. Carr171 A.D.2d 776 (1991)
  3. Rispoli v. Rispoli131 A.D.2d 556 (1987)
  4. Bartal v. Bartal117 A.D.2d 698 (1986)
  5. Borg v. Borg107 A.D.2d 777 (1985)
  6. Clarkson v. Clarkson103 A.D.2d 964 (1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Diemer v. Diemer, 168 N.E.2d 654 (N.Y. 1960) 73
Mante v. Mante, 34 A.D.2d 134 (1970) 19
Benarroch v. Benarroch, 55 A.D.2d 943 (1977) 6
Dudzick v. Dudzick, 84 Misc. 2d 731 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1975) 5
McKay v. McKay, 78 A.D.2d 676 (1980) 3
Arnold v. Arnold, 52 A.D.2d 546 (1976) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list