TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

E. Y. Gilkey & Sons, Inc. v. A-E Architectural Materials, Inc.

E. Y. Gilkey & Sons, Inc. v. A-E Architectural Materials, Inc., 86 A.D.2d 970 (1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 26, 1982
Citations
86 A.D.2d 970448 N.Y.S.2d 2901982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1567033 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 472

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly granted summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint as barred by the Statute of Frauds (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-201, subd [1]). Plaintiff seeks to recover for breach of an alleged contract under which defendant promised to supply windows at an agreed price of $18,000 for installation on a school job on which plaintiff was a contractor. Concededly there is no writing signed by or on behalf of defendant. Plaintiff’s contention that defendant is deprived of the defense of subdivision (1) of section 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code because of its failure to object in writing to plaintiff’s order for the windows dated June 23, 1980 within 10 days of its receipt must be rejected. While the transaction is one “ ‘[b]etween merchants’ ” (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-104, subd [3]), it is clear from the complaint and affidavits that the order of June 23, was not “in confirmation of” any prior oral agreement for the purchase of the windows. On the contrary, the complaint alleges that the contract sued on was made on June 23, 1980, the date of the purchase order. Plaintiff’s affidavits refer to no oral agreement prior to June 23 but state that the alleged contract was formed by defendant’s acceptance through its conduct and its acquiescence by failing to object to the June 23 order. Thus, subdivision (2) of section 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code is not applicable and the alleged contract is unenforceable under subdivision (1) of section 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code (see Itoh & Co. [Amer.] v Jordan Int. Co., 552 F2d 1228, 1232, 1233; Matter of Marlene Inds. Corp. [Carnac Textiles], 45 NY2d 327, 331 ; Pecker Iron Works v Sturdy Concrete Co., 96 Misc 2d 998, 1003 ; 3 Duesenberg-King, Sales and Bulk Transfers under the Uniform Commercial Code, § 2.04[2], pp 2-68, 2-73). (Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Boomer, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 21986: 11988: 119852026peak 1985 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Triangle Marketing, Inc. v. Action Industries, Inc.630 F. Supp. 1578 (N.D. Ill. 1986)
  2. Norminjil Sportswear Corp. v. T G & Y Stores Co.644 F. Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)
  3. Spinnerin Yarn Co., Inc. v. Apparel Retail Corp.614 F. Supp. 1174 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)
  4. Bazak International Corp. v. Mast Industries, Inc.140 A.D.2d 211 (1988)

Most recent

  1. Bazak International Corp. v. Mast Industries, Inc.140 A.D.2d 211 (1988)
  2. Triangle Marketing, Inc. v. Action Industries, Inc.630 F. Supp. 1578 (N.D. Ill. 1986)
  3. Spinnerin Yarn Co., Inc. v. Apparel Retail Corp.614 F. Supp. 1174 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)
  4. Norminjil Sportswear Corp. v. T G & Y Stores Co.644 F. Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
In re the Arbitration between Marlene Indus. Corp. & Carnac Textiles, 380 N.E.2d 239 (N.Y. 1978) 149
Pecker Iron Works, Inc. v. Sturdy Concrete Co., 96 Misc. 2d 998 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1978) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list