TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Avram v. Haddad

David Avram, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian Marrell Avram v. Joseph C. Haddad

Avram v. Haddad, 88 A.D.2d 942 (1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 14, 1982
Citations
88 A.D.2d 942451 N.Y.S.2d 1781982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17296

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jordan, J.), entered March 13, 1981, which, after a jury trial, was in favor of plaintiffs in the principal amount of $5,400, upon a finding that the infant plaintiff was 70% negligent. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The infant plaintiff suffered a break of his left femur on January 9, 1976, allegedly as the result of the defendant’s negligent operation of his motor vehicle. During the trial, the court admitted a police report into evidence, despite the fact that the subscribing officer did not witness the accident, and was unable to indicate the actual source of the information contained in the report. Since the report contained statements which were “relevant to ultimate issues of fact” the report’s admission into evidence was prejudicial and constituted reversible error (see Murray v Donlan, 77 AD2d 337, 346 ). Furthermore, the court’s failure to charge the jury that any negligence on the part of the infant plaintiff’s older brother could not be imputed to the infant plaintiff, constituted reversible error, as it precluded the jury from fairly considering the issues presented (see Anchor Motor Frgt. v Shapiro, 56 AD2d 573 ). Moreover, the court’s supplemental charge which held the infant plaintiff accountable for understanding the provisions of the “cross-walk rule” was improper. A five-year-old child may not be charged with the understanding of such a rule (see Dugan v Dieber, 32 AD2d 815 ; Rubin v O’Donnell, 37 AD2d 858 ; Schaffner v Rockmacher, 38 AD2d 835 ). Despite the earlier portions of the charge, which correctly set forth the duties of the infant plaintiff, portions of the charge were obviously conflicting, and the cumulative effect was prejudicial, requiring a new trial (see Dugan v Dieber, supra). We have considered plaintiffs’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 11989: 11991: 11992: 11996: 12001: 12006: 12008: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bjelicic v. Lynned Realty Corp.152 A.D.2d 151 (1989)
  2. Kilburn v. Acands, Inc.187 A.D.2d 988 (1992)
  3. Cardona v. County of Albany188 Misc. 2d 440 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2001)
  4. Dimino v. Burriesci125 A.D.2d 361 (1986)
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Stone170 A.D.2d 599 (1991)
  6. Battista v. Rizzi228 A.D.2d 533 (1996)

Most recent

  1. Mata v. Huntington Union Free School District57 A.D.3d 738 (2008) · Dissent
  2. Ferguson v. Iqbal33 A.D.3d 657 (2006)
  3. Cardona v. County of Albany188 Misc. 2d 440 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2001)
  4. Battista v. Rizzi228 A.D.2d 533 (1996)
  5. Kilburn v. Acands, Inc.187 A.D.2d 988 (1992)
  6. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Stone170 A.D.2d 599 (1991)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Dugan v. Dieber, 32 A.D.2d 815 (1969) 8
Murray v. Donlan, 77 A.D.2d 337 (1980) 60
Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. v. Shapiro, 56 A.D.2d 573 (1977) 6
Schaffner v. Rockmacher, 38 A.D.2d 835 (1972) 5
Rubin v. O'Donnell, 37 A.D.2d 858 (1971) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list