TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Cummings

The People of the State of New York v. Willie Cummings

People v. Cummings, 90 A.D.2d 622 (1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 21, 1982
Citations
90 A.D.2d 622456 N.Y.S.2d 2361982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18692

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Trial Term (Smyk, J.), rendered November 19, 1981 in Chemung County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree. The charges against defendant arise out of an incident which occurred at about 1:40 a.m. July 25,1981, in a parking lot outside of the Inside New York Bar in Elmira Heights, New York. One Carl Keegan sustained serious knife wounds to his chest and abdomen, and but for prompt medical attention, would have died. Defendant denied the charges against him, and the knife purportedly used to injure Keegan was never found. On this appeal, the only issue is the sufficiency of the proof of the elements of the crimes charged to establish the guilt of defendant. That proof, in our view, clearly establishes, from the testimony of eyewitnesses, the presence of a knife in the hand of defendant at the time and place of the injury to Keegan, and its *623 use against one eyewitness and the victim. The inferences that can reasonably be drawn by the jury, from the evidence they heard, establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant was the perpetrator of the assault against Keegan and that the injuries inflicted upon him were with an intent to kill (People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 277 ). As triers of the facts, it is the jury’s exclusive domain to determine the credibility of the various witnesses (.People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375 ; People v Bracey, 41 NY2d 296 ). Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 31985: 219832026peak 1983 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Irving107 A.D.2d 944 (1985)
  2. People v. Crampton107 A.D.2d 998 (1985)
  3. People v. Gaito98 A.D.2d 909 (1983)
  4. People v. Joseph AA.92 A.D.2d 649 (1983)
  5. People v. Bowles97 A.D.2d 886 (1983)

Most recent

  1. People v. Crampton107 A.D.2d 998 (1985)
  2. People v. Irving107 A.D.2d 944 (1985)
  3. People v. Gaito98 A.D.2d 909 (1983)
  4. People v. Bowles97 A.D.2d 886 (1983)
  5. People v. Joseph AA.92 A.D.2d 649 (1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Barnes, 406 N.E.2d 1071 (N.Y. 1980) 404
People v. Castillo, 391 N.E.2d 997 (N.Y. 1979) 95

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list