Velez v. Springer
Carmen Velez, as Administratrix of the Estate of Julio Velez v. Morris Springer
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
—■ In a medical malpractice and wrongful death action, defendant Springer appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Composta, J.), dated June 29, 1982, which, after a traverse hearing, denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. The deputy sheriff’s attempt to personally serve defendant Springer on three separate occasions at Springer’s combined home and office, at least one of which was during his office hours, constituted due diligence in attempting personal service as required under CPLR 308 (subd 4). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.