TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Cappucci

The People of the State of New York v. Anthony Cappucci

People v. Cappucci, 94 A.D.2d 746 (1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 16, 1983
Citations
94 A.D.2d 746462 N.Y.S.2d 5071983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18199

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

— Appeal by defendant (by permission) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J., on the order; Booth, J., on the decision), entered July 1, 1982, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to vacate a sentence imposed August 20,1980, following his adjudication as a second felony offender. Order reversed, on the law, and motion granted; the sentence imposed August 20, 1980 is vacated and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing. On July 17, 1972, defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of transportation of stolen vehicles (US Code, tit 18, § 2312), and sale or receipt of stolen vehicles (US Code, tit 18, § 2313), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. His adjudication as a second felony offender on August 20, 1980 was based upon his prior Federal convictions. The Federal statutes under which defendant was convicted do not specify a monetary value for the stolen vehicle. To constitute the felonies of grand larceny in the third degree or criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, it must be established that the value of the stolen property exceeds $250 (Penal Law, § 155.30, subd 1; § 165.45, subd 1). Inasmuch as the critical element of value is not an element of the Federal crimes of which defendant was convicted, said crimes were not necessarily offenses punishable as felonies in New York. The People, with commendable candor,- so concede. Defendant’s sentence as a second felony offender cannot stand, notwithstanding the fact that the issue had not been raised prior to the time of sentencing (see People v Ostin, 62 AD2d 1004 ). Accordingly, the sentence imposed on August 20, 1980 is vacated and the matter is remitted for resentencing. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 11984: 31985: 21988: 11990: 119832026peak 1984 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Abreu114 A.D.2d 853 (1985)
  2. People v. Burgos97 A.D.2d 826 (1983)
  3. People v. Love111 A.D.2d 134 (1985)
  4. People v. Barnes99 A.D.2d 877 (1984)
  5. People v. Williams100 A.D.2d 760 (1984)
  6. People v. Giraldo106 A.D.2d 401 (1984)

Most recent

  1. People v. Polowczyk157 A.D.2d 865 (1990)
  2. People v. Simmons143 A.D.2d 153 (1988)
  3. People v. Abreu114 A.D.2d 853 (1985)
  4. People v. Love111 A.D.2d 134 (1985)
  5. People v. Giraldo106 A.D.2d 401 (1984)
  6. People v. Williams100 A.D.2d 760 (1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Ostin, 62 A.D.2d 1004 (1978) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list