Marine Repair Services Inc. v. Harbour Container Repair Co.
Marine Repair Services, Inc. v. Harbour Container Repair Co., Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— In an action on a note in which plaintiff moved pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, plaintiff appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglas, J.), dated January 3, 1983, which denied its motion. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendant’s affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement is sufficiently supported by the affidavits and documents submitted by defendant in opposition to plaintiff’s motion so as to make inappropriate a grant of summary judgment at this juncture. The conclusory nature of some of the statements contained in defendant’s affidavits may be due to the fact that there has been no discovery in this case. Plaintiff may renew its motion, if it be *792 so advised, when discovery is completed (CPLR 3212, subd [f]; Feldman v Esikoff, 93 AD2d 807 ). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(affirming denial of § 3213 motion due to defendant’s affirmative defense and directing that plaintiff could renew summary judgment motion after discovery)
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.