TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Mitchell

Chrysler Credit Corporation v. Patsy Mitchell, Also Known as Pat Mitchell

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Mitchell, 94 A.D.2d 971 (1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 25, 1983
Citations
94 A.D.2d 971464 N.Y.S.2d 961983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1846036 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1451

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

. Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiff summary judgment in an action on a written guarantee of a debt. Defendants claim that they are not liable since the debt was secured by collateral, and the plaintiff seized and accepted the collateral in full satisfaction of the debt. An election to take the collateral in full satisfaction will not be implied; it must be made by written notice to the debtor (Flickinger Co. v 18 Genesee Corp., 71 AD2d 382, 385 ). Since no such written notice was given, defendants’ claim must fail. Defendants further claim that summary judgment was improper because plaintiff did not submit evidence that it complied with section 9-504 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which required plaintiff to dispose of the collateral in a commercially reasonable manner after notice to the debtor. Failure to comply with that section, however, did not deprive plaintiff of its right to summary judgment, but upon the trial to determine the amount of the damages, plaintiff must prove the fair market value of the collateral seized, which must be deducted from the debt to establish the deficiency (Flickinger Co. v 18 Genesee Corp., supra, p 385; Marine Midland Bank v Connelly, 79 AD2d 1102 ). There being no issue of fact other than the amount of the damages, the court properly granted summary judgment. Defendants correctly assert that the order directing the assessment of damages by the court alone improperly deprived them of their right to a jury trial. The action is one in which the defendants were entitled to a jury trial as of right, and there is nothing in the record to show that they have waived that right. The order should be amended, therefore, to direct the assessment of damages by a court and jury (Livingston v Blumenthal, 248 App Div 138,140 ). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Siracuse, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P.; Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
1985: 21986: 21987: 21988: 11989: 31990: 11991: 11993: 21994: 11995: 21996: 22003: 12004: 12019: 119852026peak 1989 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bank of China v. David C.W. Chan937 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1991)
  2. Paco Corp. v. Vigliarola611 F. Supp. 923 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)
  3. IFG Leasing Co. v. Gordon776 P.2d 607 (Utah 1989)
  4. Cohen v. Rains769 S.W.2d 380 (Tex. App. 1989)
  5. Alamosa National Bank v. San Luis Valley Grain Growers, Inc.756 P.2d 1022 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988)
  6. Allen v. Coates661 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Kapor v. RJC Inv., Inc.2019 MT 41, 434 P.3d 869
  2. Burns v. Anderson123 F. App'x 543 (4th Cir. 2004)
  3. Buffalo & Erie County Regional Development Corp. v. World Auto Parts, Inc.306 A.D.2d 857 (2003)
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Wrapwell Corp.922 F. Supp. 913 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
  5. Four Queens Enterprises, Inc. v. Forbes (In re Forbes)191 B.R. 510 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1996)
  6. Allen v. Coates661 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
S. M. Flickinger Co. v. 18 Genesee Corp., 71 A.D.2d 382 (1979) 41
Livingston v. Blumenthal, 248 A.D. 138 (1936) 22
Marine Midland Bank v. Connelly, 79 A.D.2d 1102 (1981) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list