TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Macy

The People of the State of New York v. Marsha A. Macy

People v. Macy, 100 A.D.2d 557 (1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 12, 1984
Citations
100 A.D.2d 557473 N.Y.S.2d 2611984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17527

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), rendered April 6, 1982, convicting her of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, f Judgment affirmed. 1i By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited any right to appellate review of the denial of her motion to dismiss the indictment in the interest of justice (CPL 210.40). The issue does not relate to the jurisdiction of the court or the voluntary and knowing nature of the plea, and is not otherwise appealable by statute (see People v Evans, 58 NY2d 14, 21, n 1 ; People v Di Raffaele, 55 NY2d 234, 240 ; People v Scheinert, 93 AD2d 894 ; People v Thomas, 74 AD2d 317, 319-322 , affd 53 NY2d 338 ; cf. People v Sobotker, 61 NY2d 44 ). Nor do our interests of justice powers (see CPL 470.15, subd 6) authorize review of issues waived by a plea of guilty (People v Howe, 56 NY2d 622 ). H In any event, a trial court may deny a motion to dismiss the indictment in the interest of justice without a detailed enumeration of the various statutory factors and without a hearing (see People v Rickert, 58 NY2d 122 ; Bellacosa, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11 A, CPL 210.40, pp 155-156), and, on this record, we perceive no compelling factor which would have warranted the granting of the motion (see People v Viszokai, 99 AD2d 519 ; People v Belkota, 50 AD2d 118, 120 ). Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1984: 11985: 11986: 41987: 11988: 11989: 11990: 21992: 11994: 11999: 12000: 12012: 119842026peak 1986 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Tavares273 A.D.2d 707 (2000)
  2. People v. Gerber182 A.D.2d 252 (1992)
  3. People v. Shedrick104 A.D.2d 263 (1984)
  4. People v. Bray154 A.D.2d 692 (1989) · Dissent
  5. People v. Purcell161 A.D.2d 812 (1990)
  6. People v. Longwood116 A.D.2d 590 (1986)

Most recent

  1. People v. Smith100 A.D.3d 936 (2012)
  2. People v. Tavares273 A.D.2d 707 (2000)
  3. People v. Sheldon180 Misc. 2d 876 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1999)
  4. People v. Branham208 A.D.2d 361 (1994)
  5. People v. Gerber182 A.D.2d 252 (1992)
  6. People v. Sierra149 Misc. 2d 588 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1990)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 10

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Thomas, 424 N.E.2d 537 (N.Y. 1981) 158
People v. Raffaele, 433 N.E.2d 513 (N.Y. 1982) 125
People v. Rickert, 446 N.E.2d 419 (N.Y. 1983) 111
People v. Thomas, 74 A.D.2d 317 (1980) 90
People v. Belkota, 50 A.D.2d 118 (1975) 41
People v. Howe, 435 N.E.2d 1092 (N.Y. 1982) 32
People v. Evans, 444 N.E.2d 7 (N.Y. 1982) 30
People v. Sobotker, 459 N.E.2d 187 (N.Y. 1984) 28
People v. Viszokai, 99 A.D.2d 519 (1984) 8
People v. Scheinert, 93 A.D.2d 894 (1983) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list