Reinig v. Laehy
In the Matter of Robert Reinig v. Gillman J. Laehy, as General Manager of the Buffalo Sewer Authority
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying respondents’ motion to dismiss this CPLR article 78 petition. The collective bargaining agreement between the parties provides a four-step grievance process culminating in arbitration which applies to any dispute which relates to “application, meaning and interpretation” of the agreement. This dispute, as to whether respondents were required to give petitioner notice and a hearing prior to docking him one-half day’s pay, is clearly encompassed by the collective bargaining agreement and petitioner was required to avail himself of the grievance procedure prior to seeking article 78 relief (Matter ofBaran v Otterbein, 84 AD2d 928 ). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.