Curcio v. Smith
In the Matter of Antonio Curcio v. Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility
Curcio v. Smith, 101 A.D.2d 705 (1984)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgment unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in opinion at Special Term, Conable, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Conable, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 21 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.