Goglia v. Sardino
Thomas Goglia v. Thomas J. Sardino, as Chief of Police of the City of Syracuse
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated at Special Term. We add only that, concerning the defense of the Statute of Limitations, the *1014 respondents failed to state facts showing that the action was commenced more than four months after respondents’ refusal, upon demand of the petitioner, to perform their duty. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ. [ 119 Misc 2d 907 .]
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.