Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America
Kathleen H. Harper v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— In an action to compel the defendant to pay over to plaintiff the proceeds of a life insurance policy, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rubenfeld, J.), dated December 14, 1983, which denied her motion for reargument of a prior motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment, which had been denied, and a cross motion by the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, which had been granted. 11 Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. 11 An order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable (see Mader v Mader, 101 AD2d 881 ; Roberts v Connelly, 35 AD2d 813 ). Rubin, J. P., Boyers, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.