People v. Marnell
The People of the State of New York v. Howard Marnell, Jr.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On defendant’s appeal from the judgment of conviction, we have examined all issues preserved for review and find them to be without merit. Any claimed deficiency in the plea allocution was not timely raised at County Court “by motion to vacate or otherwise” and thus is not preserved for review (People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 ; cf. People v Sobczak, 105 AD2d 1053 ). Were we to undertake review, we would hold on this record that defendant’s claim is without merit.
We note, however, that subsequent to the imposition of sentence, defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 and 440.20 to set aside the judgment of conviction. There is no appeal before us from County Court’s order denying that motion. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — murder, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Den-man, Boomer and O’Donnell, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.