Sierra Lake Reserve v. The City of Rocklin the Rocklin Mobile Home Rent Review Commission Carlos Urrutia Rusty Selix Rudolf Michaels George Paras
SIERRA LAKE RESERVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF ROCKLIN; The Rocklin Mobile Home Rent Review Commission; Carlos Urrutia; Rusty Selix; Rudolf Michaels; George Paras, Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
ORDER The “[t]wo recent state court opinions [that] refused to follow our decision in Hall [v. City of Santa Barbara, 833 F.2d 1270 (9th Cir.1986)],”
Sierra Lake Reserve v. City of Rocklin, 938 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir.1991), have proven prescient.
See Yee v. City of Escondido, — U.S.-,-, 112 S.Ct. 1522, 1527, 1531 , 118 L.Ed.2d 153 (1992). We therefore vacate Part I of the Sierra Lake Reserve opinion, which dealt with the physical taking claim. We retain Part II because the due process and equal protection claims it considered are unaffected by Yee. See — U.S. at-, 112 S.Ct. at 1531 . We express no opinion on whether the city ordinance could constitute a regulatory taking — a question Yee leaves open, see id.
— because no regulatory taking argument was made to us or the court below.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 17 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm Desert
- Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande
- Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
- Halverson v. Skagit County
- Carson Harbor Village Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, Dba Carson Harbor Village Mobile Home Park v. City of Carson, a Municipal Corporation
- Galland v. City of Clovis
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.