TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Major

The People of the State of New York v. Kertais Major

People v. Major, 116 A.D.2d 594 (1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 13, 1986
Citations
116 A.D.2d 594497 N.Y.S.2d 4541986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51449

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered June 21, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and attempted assault in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant concedes in his brief that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree. He argues, however, that his conviction on the two assault counts cannot be sustained because the People failed to disprove his defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, however, as we must, we find that defendant’s guilt of these counts was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755 , cert denied — US —, 105 S Ct 327 ; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ). There is simply no reasonable view of the evidence that would support *595 a defense of justification (see, People v Alston, 104 AD2d 653 ). Defendant’s failure to retreat when he was able to do so, and the number of stab wounds sustained by both victims, negates the essential elements of the defense (see, Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; People v Doctor, 98 AD2d 780, 781 ; People v Alston, supra; People v Collice, 41 NY2d 906 , 907).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1990: 11991: 21992: 21999: 119902026peak 1991 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Brown187 A.D.2d 312 (1992)
  2. People v. Jones175 A.D.2d 294 (1991)
  3. People v. Harris173 A.D.2d 486 (1991)
  4. People v. Enriquez266 A.D.2d 308 (1999)
  5. People v. Turner165 A.D.2d 798 (1990)
  6. People v. Lima187 A.D.2d 360 (1992)

Most recent

  1. People v. Enriquez266 A.D.2d 308 (1999)
  2. People v. Lima187 A.D.2d 360 (1992)
  3. People v. Brown187 A.D.2d 312 (1992)
  4. People v. Jones175 A.D.2d 294 (1991)
  5. People v. Harris173 A.D.2d 486 (1991)
  6. People v. Turner165 A.D.2d 798 (1990)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Alston, 104 A.D.2d 653 (1984) 24
People v. Contes, 454 N.E.2d 932 (N.Y. 1983) 10,369
People v. Malizia, 465 N.E.2d 364 (N.Y. 1984) 846
People v. Doctor, 98 A.D.2d 780 (1983) 21

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list