TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Claim of Stevens v. Walsh Construction Co.

In the Matter of the Claim of Donald Stevens v. Walsh Construction Company, Workers' Compensation Board

Claim of Stevens v. Walsh Constr. Co., 120 A.D.2d 802 (1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 1, 1986
Judges
Yesawich
Citations
120 A.D.2d 802501 N.Y.S.2d 5431986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56931

Opinion of the Court — Yesawich

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

— Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 1, 1985.

On October 16, 1982, claimant was injured in a one-car accident while driving from work to his newly rented, but as yet unoccupied, home in the Village of Mexico, Oswego County. In accordance with the employment contract, the employer, Walsh Construction Company (Walsh), had been paying claimant a flat fee of $6 daily for travel between work and home irrespective of the location of claimant’s place of residence. Walsh maintains that the accident did not occur in the course of claimant’s employment in that the latter deviated from the usual route to his actual residence, a trailer park located in the community of Mallory, Oswego County. The Workers’ Compensation Board disagreed, concluded that claimant sustained a compensable injury in the course of his employment, and awarded benefits.

It is settled law that injuries incurred during a paid trip from work to home are compensable (see, e.g., Matter of Saracione v Oliver Constr. Co., 87 AD2d 926 ; see generally, Matter of Holcomb v Daily News, 45 NY2d 602, 606-607 ). Here, claimant was injured while en route to his Mexico house, to which he was in the process of moving his family, and where most of his personal possessions and belongings were then located. Moreover, he was proceeding there directly after work. That during this transition period claimant’s family may have been using both residences does not detract from the Board’s determination.

Decision affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Claim of Holcomb v. Daily News, 384 N.E.2d 665 (N.Y. 1978) 27
Claim of Saracione v. Oliver Constr. Co., 87 A.D.2d 926 (1982) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list