TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Barr

In the Matter of Jerome H. Barr, as Executors of Milton Kaufman, Deceased,. for the Dissolution of Puccini Clothes, Ltd. Lee Feltman, Appellant-Respondent George Sassower

In re Barr, 121 A.D.2d 324 (1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 24, 1986
Citations
121 A.D.2d 324503 N.Y.S.2d 3921986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58284

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order of Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered January 21, 1986, denying renewal of the receiver’s motion to confirm the Official Referee’s report and to punish respondent Sassower for contempt is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, renewal is granted and, upon renewal, the underlying order of November 22, 1985 is modified only to the extent of imposing a sentence of 30 days’ incarceration and directing that a warrant of commitment issue forthwith, and is otherwise affirmed.

The appeal from order of the same court and Justice, *325 entered November 22, 1985, confirming the Official Referee’s report to the extent that it found respondent guilty of contempt but denying (with leave to renew) the Referee’s recommendation for imposition of a jail sentence and fines, is dismissed as subsumed in the appeal from the order denying renewal.

We agree with the Justice at Special Term that the report of the Referee should be confirmed. That report finds George Sassower guilty of 63 counts of criminal contempt in violating and continuing to violate an order of disqualification. However, in our opinion Special Term abused its discretion by its failure to impose a sanction in the light of the continuing contempts and respondent’s stated intention to continue to do so.

Accordingly, we have directed that respondent be incarcerated for 30 days, and that a warrant of commitment issue forthwith. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lynch, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 11987: 11993: 12006: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sassower v. Sheriff of Westchester County824 F.2d 184 (2d Cir. 1987)
  2. Sassower v. Sheriff of Westchester County651 F. Supp. 128 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
  3. Sassower v. Abrams833 F. Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)
  4. Sassower v. Starr (In re Sassower)338 B.R. 212 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

Most recent

  1. Sassower v. Starr (In re Sassower)338 B.R. 212 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)
  2. Sassower v. Abrams833 F. Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)
  3. Sassower v. Sheriff of Westchester County824 F.2d 184 (2d Cir. 1987)
  4. Sassower v. Sheriff of Westchester County651 F. Supp. 128 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list