People v. Harper
The People of the State of New York v. Mitchell L. Harper, Jr.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
We find that the photographic array shown to Vincenti Gaztambide, who had witnessed the shooting, was not unduly suggestive, and the hearing court’s decision to allow Gaztambide to make an in-court identification was proper (see, Manson v Brathwaite, 432 US 98 ; People v McMickel, 105 AD2d 851 ; People v Jones, 85 AD2d 50 ).
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those advanced in his supplemental brief submitted pro se, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Fiber, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.