TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Uniondale Union Free School District v. Newman

In the Matter of Uniondale Union Free School District v. Harold R. Newman, Constituting the Public Employment Relations Board, Uniondale Teachers Association, Intervenor-Respondent

Uniondale Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Newman, 140 A.D.2d 612 (1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 23, 1988
Citations
140 A.D.2d 612528 N.Y.S.2d 6551988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5689

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Adjudged that the petition is granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to PERB for a new determination in accordance herewith.

The petitioner employs 400 teachers who are represented by the intervenor union. Of these 400, 17 are designated as chairpersons. It is these 17 people who wish to form their own bargaining unit. PERB determined, after a hearing, that the circumstances did not warrant the splintering of the present bargaining unit. It did so despite its own decisions which presented similar facts but arrived at the opposite conclusion.

"[UJnless [PERB’s] determination was 'affected by an error of law’ or was 'arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion’, we will not interfere (CPLR 7803, subd 3)” (Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook v New York State Pub. Employment Relations Bd., 48 NY2d 398, 404 ). While we are therefore limited in our review, we must determine whether or not PERB’s determination was "arbitrary and capricious”. The Court of Appeals has said: "A decision of an administrative agency which neither adheres to its own prior precedent nor indicates its reason for reaching a different result on essentially the same facts is arbitrary and capricious” (Matter of Field Delivery Serv. [Roberts], 66 NY2d 516, 516-517 ).

Here, PERB reached the opposite conclusion on essentially *613 the same facts from that arrived at in two of its previous decisions, Matter of East Greenbush Cent. School Dist. (17 PERB H 3083) and Matter of Hyde Park Cent. School Dist. (16 PERB jf 3083). It did so without explanation.

Its failure to explain its inconsistent determinations mandates that the instant determination be annulled (see, Matter of Health Related Nutrition Servs. [Roberts], 123 AD2d 466, 467-468 ). Lawrence, J.. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1990: 11991: 11992: 119902026peak 1990 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
In re Charles A. Field Delivery Serv., Inc., 488 N.E.2d 1223 (N.Y. 1985) 271
Inc. Vill. of Lynbrook v. N.Y. State Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 399 N.E.2d 55 (N.Y. 1979) 91
In re Health Related Nutrition Servs., Inc., 123 A.D.2d 466 (1986) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list