Garza v. VICO Utilities, Inc.
John M. Garza v. VICO Utilities, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Motion by the respondents for an order striking the supplemental record and reply brief filed by the appellants on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated January 15, 1988.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,
Ordered that the motion is granted.
The purported supplemental record and reply brief contain material that is dehors the record and may not be considered by this court in connection with the appeal (see, Broida v Bancroft, 103 AD2d 88, 93 ; Matter of Pan Am. Athletic & Social Club v Commissioner of Fin. of City of N. Y., 94 AD2d 606, 608 ). Lawrence, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.