TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Heady

The People of the State of New York v. Sanford J. Heady, Jr.

People v. Heady, 151 A.D.2d 844 (1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 15, 1989
Judges
Yesawich
Citations
151 A.D.2d 844543 N.Y.S.2d 9651989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7530

Opinion of the Court — Yesawich

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered June 13, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

Defendant was convicted for participating in the burglary of a residence which yielded a television set, the details of which defendant freely explained during his plea allocution. In his signed confession, defendant described what happened following the burglary: “On January 13th 1987 Detective Sergeant Burchell came to me at Lake Mohonk and asked if I had a T.V. in my room, I told him no and took him to someone else’s room and told him it was my room. I then left and was asked by Mike Benniati who is Chief of Security to return a few minutes later. Sgt. Burchell advised me of my rights and asked me if he could look in room 769 [defendant’s residence], I unlocked the door and showed him the T.V., at this point he told me I was under [a]rrest.” As a result of a plea bargain negotiated by defendant’s attorney, defendant received the minimum sentence permitted for second degree burglary.

Defendant’s principal complaints are that he was not notified of Grand Jury proceedings and of his opportunity to testify thereat, and that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. Since defendant’s guilty plea waives his right to raise the first claim (see, People v Kehn, 132 AD2d 778, 779 , lv denied 70 NY2d 800 ), we need not address its merits, which appear to be lacking, in any event. The other challenge is patently without merit, given the strength of the prosecution’s case and the favorable disposition secured by defendant’s counsel under the circumstances.

*845 Judgment affirmed. Kane, J P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Bray154 A.D.2d 692 (1989) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. People v. Bray154 A.D.2d 692 (1989) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Kehn, 132 A.D.2d 778 (1987) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list