TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jack Wayne Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak

Jack Wayne FRIEND, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald KOLODZIECZAK, Et Al., Defendants-Appellants

Friend v. Kolodzieczak, 992 F.2d 243 (9th Cir. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 18, 1993
Docket
No. 90-16140
Judges
Pregerson, Ferguson, O'Scannlain
Citations
992 F.2d 24393 Daily Journal DAR 62551993 WL 15846993 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 36341993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11358

Opinion

ORDER The Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and then remanded this cáse to this court for further consideration, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1038 , 122 L.Ed.2d 348 , in light of Farrar v. Hobby, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566 , 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).

This court now remands the matter to the district court to re-examine its determination of the reasonableness of the attorneys’ fee award in light of the Farrar v. Hobby decision.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1995: 219952026peak 1995 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak72 F.3d 1386 (9th Cir. 1995)
  2. Friend v. Kolodzieczak65 F.3d 1514 (9th Cir. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak72 F.3d 1386 (9th Cir. 1995)
  2. Friend v. Kolodzieczak65 F.3d 1514 (9th Cir. 1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103 (1992) 2,751

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list