TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Murphy v. Murphy

Eileen C. Murphy v. Patrick J. Murphy

Murphy v. Murphy, 160 A.D.2d 588 (1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 24, 1990
Citations
160 A.D.2d 588

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about July 14, 1989, which denied the motion of the respondent Patrick Murphy to vacate a May 29, 1986 order of support, entered on default, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted, without costs.

On this record there was an insufficient showing that the respondent received actual notice of the hearing, required by Family Court Act § 427 (c), before a default judgment could be obtained. At the time of the support hearing on May 29, 1986, defendant had moved from his home in Ulster County, New York, to the State of Rhode Island. At times he returned to work on Roosevelt Island in New York City. Respondent denied that he received notice of the May 29, 1986 hearing. While there was evidence of notices of hearing being sent to various addresses where defendant allegedly worked or had contact, there was no evidence that he actually received any notice. While a notice of a support hearing sent to Roosevelt Island was apparently never returned, other notices of scheduled support hearings were returned as undeliverable. In addition, while there was an assertion by the office of the Corporation Counsel that a lawyer representing respondent had been in contact with that office, no attorney ever served a notice of appearance and respondent denied retaining an attorney. Given the lack of actual notice, it was error for the Family Court to reject the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner that the support order of May 29, 1986 be vacated. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1995: 119952026peak 1995 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stone v. Stone218 A.D.2d 824 (1995)

Most recent

  1. Stone v. Stone218 A.D.2d 824 (1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list