TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Larry Joe Moore, and Carolyn Jean Moore v. Fdic, as Receiver for Huntsville National Bank

Larry Joe MOORE, and Carolyn Jean Moore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, as Receiver for Huntsville National Bank, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Moore v. Fdic, as Receiver for Huntsville Nat'l Bank, 993 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 14, 1993
Docket
No. 92-2739
Judges
Reavley, Higginbotham, Garza
Citations
993 F.2d 106

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs sued for wrongful foreclosure on their property. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. The brief filed by plaintiffs on this appeal contains only conclusions without reference to the record. No issues are acceptably presented in accord with the rules. The appeal is dismissed.

The reasons for the district court’s summary judgment were stated in open court, but nothing of this ruling is brought forward in the record. That record stands 8^ inches high. Plaintiffs’ brief specifies no place in the record and identifies no proof to support statements to the effect that the foreclosure was made without notice to the plaintiffs and despite the stay of a bankruptcy court. Defendants have answered specifically with reference to contrary summary judgment evidence in the record.

The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure require references to the record to support statements of fact. R. 28(a)(4), R. 28(e). The Fifth Circuit’s Local Rule 28.2.3 states:

Every assertion in briefs regarding matter in the record shall be supported by a reference to the page number of the original record where the matter relied upon is to be found.

This dismissal will be reconsidered if, with motion for rehearing filed within 14 days, plaintiffs support the motion with a succinct statement of any material issue of fact raised by the summary judgment record, identifying the supporting evidence by page reference and also by reference to the contrary evidence cited by defendants’ briefs (with page numbers) and an explanation of why the summary judgment was unwarranted in that respect.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
1995: 31996: 31997: 41998: 12000: 12001: 12004: 12007: 22009: 12014: 12022: 22024: 12026: 119952026peak 1997 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Arvie v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.349 F. App'x 868 (5th Cir. 2009)
  2. Mills v. Ege68 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 1995)
  3. Douglass v. United Svcs AutoNo. 95-50007 (5th Cir. Oct. 2, 1995)
  4. Lemaire v. Danos & CuroleNo. 00-31153 (5th Cir. July 13, 2001)
  5. Askanase v. Fatjo130 F.3d 657 (5th Cir. 1997)
  6. N/S CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY127 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 1997)

Most recent

  1. Salubrio, LLC v. Eric B. Terry, Chapter 7 TrusteeNo. 5:25-cv-00824 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2026)
  2. Smith v. TerryNo. 5:23-cv-00194 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 2024)
  3. Smith, MD. v. TerryNo. 5:21-cv-00476 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2022)
  4. Berkley v. Lafayette County, MississippiNo. 3:19-cv-00217 (N.D. Miss. Jan. 28, 2022)
  5. Robert Hudnall v. University of Texas at El Paso582 F. App'x 335 (5th Cir. 2014)
  6. Arvie v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.349 F. App'x 868 (5th Cir. 2009)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list