TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Selassie

The People of the State of New York v. Kimani Selassie

People v. Selassie, 166 A.D.2d 358 (1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 25, 1990
Citations
166 A.D.2d 358561 N.Y.S.2d 241990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12763

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.), rendered March 7, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, and resisting arrest and sentencing him to two concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years on the robbery and grand *359 larceny counts and a concurrent definite one-year term on the reckless endangerment count, is unanimously modified on the law, the conviction for grand larceny in the second degree reduced to petit larceny, and the sentence imposed on the grand larceny conviction vacated, and otherwise affirmed.

The complainant’s rough estimate of the value of her jewelry was insufficient to prove that defendant stole property that exceeded $1,500 in value (People v Sweeney, 125 AD2d 978 ). The complainant’s testimony that the jewelry was worth more than $1,500 was impeached by her Grand Jury testimony that the jewelry was worth "give or take” that sum, and there is insufficient evidence in the record to show how the complainant estimated the value. She was not qualified as an expert and gave limited testimony on how much she paid for the jewelry. It is unnecessary to remand for resentencing since defendant has already served the maximum time to which he could have been sentenced on the petit larceny conviction. (People v Womble, 111 AD2d 283 .)

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s preliminary instructions is unpreserved and meritless. Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Smith, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1992: 11993: 11995: 12012: 419922026peak 2012 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Lopez592 N.E.2d 1360 (N.Y. 1992)
  2. People v. Pallagi91 A.D.3d 1266 (2012)
  3. People v. Geroyianis96 A.D.3d 1641 (2012)
  4. People v. Gonzalez221 A.D.2d 203 (1995)
  5. People v. Perez196 A.D.2d 444 (1993)
  6. GEROYIANIS, LOUIS, PEOPLE vNo. KA 10-02081 (N.Y. App. Div. June 15, 2012)

Most recent

  1. GEROYIANIS, LOUIS, PEOPLE vNo. KA 10-02081 (N.Y. App. Div. June 15, 2012)
  2. People v. Geroyianis96 A.D.3d 1641 (2012)
  3. PALLAGI, SASHALEE, PEOPLE vNo. KA 11-00745 (N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 31, 2012)
  4. People v. Pallagi91 A.D.3d 1266 (2012)
  5. People v. Gonzalez221 A.D.2d 203 (1995)
  6. People v. Perez196 A.D.2d 444 (1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Womble, 111 A.D.2d 283 (1985) 22
People v. Sweeney, 125 A.D.2d 978 (1986) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list