Wilson v. City of New York
Warren G. Wilson v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered February 9, 1990, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In the underlying action, plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained on June 16, 1984 as a *277 passenger in a taxicab driven by defendant George Addison, an off-duty New York City Police Officer, when the vehicle crashed into a construction site after defendant Addison had exited the vehicle in an effort to apprehend two individuals attempting to break into a parked car.
Upon examination of the record, we find that the IAS court properly dismissed the complaint as against the defendant City and its employee, defendant Addison, as time-barred pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-i where the action against the defendants was concededly not commenced within one year and ninety days after the event upon which the claim was based (Alifieris v American Airlines, 63 NY2d 370, 374 ), and where the complaint itself alleged and the record revealed that defendant Addison was, on the date in question, acting within the scope of his employment in his capacity as a member of the New York City Police Department (Bacalokonstantis v Nichols, 141 AD2d 482, 483 ).
We have reviewed the plaintiff’s remaining claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(dismissing personal injury claim against off-duty police officer where action was brought after one-year-and-ninety-day limitation period and officer was attempting to stop crime in progress when injury occurred)
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.